Football

Built from HOW + WHAT by an external AI; independently examined and admitted.

The requested field and times initially have no complete offer. The requester then permits one precise change: move the 8 January session by up to thirty minutes. The resulting offer keeps the other sessions and conditions, and fits all three slots inside the budget.

The venue computes the offer and publishes it with its evidence. The requester checks that material and uses it in its own computation. Each owner retains its own decisions; an available offer does not itself book the field.

Gemini's runtime proposal supplies the changed meaning; native Work selects the slots. The separately permitted booking changes a mock registry. The outside AI that built this domain has a different role and a separate history.

Read with your assistant: focus XML · Plain text · Who built the domain?

The exact request had no complete offer

The requester needs three ninety-minute sessions in Europe/Tirane: 7 January 2027 at 16:30, then 8 and 9 January at 11:00. Each needs a full-size natural-grass field. The budget is 7,000 minor EUR, or EUR 70.00.

The synthetic inventory includes a very cheap artificial field and field:elm, natural grass at EUR 21 per session. The cheap field fails a mandatory surface condition. Elm is occupied on 8 January from 11:00 to 11:30, so the initial EXACT request returns NO_COMPLETE_OFFER. Broad opening hours alone do not make a specific interval available.

Thirty minutes changed the offer

Before: all three shift allowances are zero. Change: the requester permits only the 8 January session to shift by up to thirty minutes, retaining the original requested times and other requirements. After: native selection finds 11:30–13:00 on that date. The other two sessions stay unchanged.

All three use field:elm: EUR 63 total, within EUR 70. In the preserved offer body, /offer/request/sessions/1/allow_shift_minutes is 30, /offer/total_minor is 6300 and /offer/status is OFFER_READY. The explicit reference consent:jan8-only permits the changed search. It does not approve a booking.

Gemini proposes meaning; native Work chooses the slots

The separate G54D1 live series records three real Gemini 2.5 Flash proposals: EXACT, SHIFT and VERIFY. The model supplies a bounded operation and parameters. Its SHIFT response changes the allowance vector to [0,30,0]; ordinary native selection determines the field, slots and total.

The consumption check joins provider output to both actual native intakes. SHIFT returns at observer sequence 31 for publisher and 61 for requester; both intake request hashes match the normalized proposal. Its independently reviewed result is OFFER_READY, with one producer Work and one consumer Work. This goes beyond a valid JSON response.

The three proposals were collected before the subsequent native booking run. The VERIFY model did not see the later receipt. Controlled owner inputs separately supplied BOOK and REPEAT. The external model that wrote the program belongs to the authorship story, not to these three runtime calls.

An offer crossed owners and became a real input

VenueRoot reviews its producer Work and release; ActivePlanetRoot reviews import and local use. They are independent local decision roles. A deeper Work graph does not place one Root above another.

The historical main capture p7_candidate_f779b790 keeps three objects distinct:

In these inspected records, B.offer = E, C.body = B, and the requester's decoded /inputs/offer_json equals C. The requester returns OFFER_READY with total 6300 in its own /outputs/result_json. A foreign result therefore becomes input to actual local computation, with provenance added at the appropriate later stage.

The consumer code makes the separation tangible. This exact excerpt is from candidate_domain/domain.py, lines 252–255, at publication ref 800f38c3407b3f4ec93dc943c977ffeecb614881:

    e=b['offer']; booking=b['booking']
    if r['operation']=='FIND_OFFER':
        need(r==e['request'] and booking is None,'find_binding')
        status=e['status']; receipt=None

Currentness has its own evidence. C's /source_projection/status is ACTIVE, checked at 1790359281 and valid until 1790359341. The body has a separate 300-second lifetime. These recorded windows support that historical use; they are not current permission for a new task today.

BOOK, REVOKED, REPEAT and VERIFY answer different questions

The main independent flow review distinguishes five events:

BOOK uses a separate CONFIRM_MOCK_BOOKING request and consent:controlled:booking. The owning Host dispatches one mock executor; it writes one batch containing three reservations. Receipt and registry readback support the completed state change. This is a real change in a disposable synthetic registry, not a payment or a real stadium reservation.

REPEAT reuses the completed result rather than issuing another batch. VERIFY uses existing history and readback without a new search or effect. Both preserve the post-BOOK registry hash. The supplied historical approval reference is evidence, not a new grant.

The separate revoked-source neighbor p7_candidate_7071661f authenticates REVOKED, refuses current use with application reason status_not_active, and records genuine native BLOCKED_FAIL_CLOSED Root decisions at observer sequences 29 and 66. It has no booking executor start. That missing Root refusal was the specific final correction in G54D1 authorship; it should not be confused with the earlier examiner contract defect.

Inspect the selected evidence

The permitted shift became a usable offer

Only the January 8 allowance changed to 30 minutes; the requester consumed an OFFER_READY result at 6300 minor EUR under 7000.

Record: G54D1 main p7_candidate_f779b790 SHIFT. Class: recorded execution. Scope: G54D1 main p7_candidate_f779b790 SHIFT; historical published evidence read as data, no new core execution or authority.

View source — G54D1 main p7_candidate_f779b790 SHIFT

One booking; no new effect for repeat or verify

The main controlled BOOK writes one mock batch; REPEAT and VERIFY preserve history with zero new effects.

Record: G54D1 main p7_candidate_f779b790. Class: historical independent review. Scope: Synthetic inventory and disposable mock registry; one batch with three slots, not a real venue purchase.

View source — G54D1 main p7_candidate_f779b790

Runtime proposals had actual native consumers

Gemini proposals reached both owners; SHIFT was consumed by actual producer and requester Work. VERIFY was precollected before the later receipt.

Record: G54D1 live p7_candidate_66a1519a. Class: historical consumption verification. Scope: G54D1 live p7_candidate_66a1519a; historical published evidence read as data, no new core execution or authority.

View source — G54D1 live p7_candidate_66a1519a

Read the Football dossier, presentation PDF and technical appendix PDF. The original football_domain.xml is 114,930 bytes; the Reader index also points to its separate common source corpus. The 8,988-byte Gate 5 entry Reader is an introductory pointer, not the complete evidence. The new site focus is a self-contained editorial introduction with selected evidence.

This is the same kernel

Like Wedding, a changed semantic field changes performed computation. External DRS explains how E becomes B and then C; Airline extends the local-owner relationship to three business participants. History can remain useful without carrying old permission forward, as in Testflix renewal.

These are related finite demonstrations, not one combined execution trace. Continue with one kernel and Geometry. The later G6A football rerun has its own identities and is not added to these G54D1 counters.

Case identity

G54D1 main p7_candidate_f779b790; separate live p7_candidate_66a1519a; revoked neighbor p7_candidate_7071661f. These are not the later G6A rerun.

Task: Arrange three ninety-minute training sessions on a full-size natural-grass field within EUR 70, then book only with separate consent.

Roles: Requester defining session constraints and approval; Gemini 2.5 Flash runtime semantic proposal provider; VenueRoot and producer Work; ActivePlanetRoot and requester Work; Native selection and external DRS checks; Host and disposable mock booking executor.

Observed result: EXACT found no complete offer; SHIFT produced and consumed a EUR 63 offer; separate BOOK changed the mock registry once; REPEAT and VERIFY recovered history without another effect.

Limits:

• Synthetic venue and inventory
• Mock booking rather than a real venue purchase
• Precollected semantic proposals
• Separate controlled BOOK and REPEAT inputs
• Finite reviewed reference profile

Read with your assistant

The existing offline edition preserves the recorded episodes, selected fields, attributed excerpts and original source routes. This webpage’s updated introduction is also available in its Markdown version. Original publications are linked in the case.

Download XML · 23,820 bytes · SHA-256: d9c40d197bf7b207a626be2c8ab5094ae33063c3306b20a885c235f1a87e3bbb

Download TXT · 22,394 bytes · SHA-256: b085a1352f7b81f903981da34e4439891b8f20a58bc3d40fdb34682bfa07fd63

Sources and scope

This page is a website explanation, updated 2026-10-03. Its explanation does not create a new execution result or change the status of its sources.